![]() I have heard some of which have been fixed in MSFS version but I don't yet got one (I don't think I'll move to MSFS anytime soon, so not yet spend my $99 credit from NGXu). And Both seems have problem with geometric descent path and still shows intermediate T/D points, and PATH indicator would goes wild on such condition.Īs my limited try, Zibo seems nailed on VNAV final approach though, while LvUP-600 goes roller-coaster when try to use VNAV for final approach, maybe it's due to the-600 still use same control logic from non-EFM -800? but it flies fine on other condition.Ĭompare to P3D counterpart, PMDG still have the best system (again, non-FMC/AP), apart from accurate, it also feels more "organic" or "live-like", not without bugs though. that might be FM issue, but as I point out on other posts, zibo seems have little less drag in level flight compare to realworld table. The main issue I have so far on both model is VNAV descend, the calculated descend profile looks reasonable, but both falling slow on descend, even with some tailwind (and wind input in forecast page doesn't seems change T/D at all). I haven't dive deep into complex failures, but one thing I noticed is when switching off IRSs, the YawDamper switch not jump back to off on Zibo while LvUP one do. I'm now evaluation both Zibo and LvUP as I'm gradually moving from P3Dv4, so far both system-wise(excluding FMC/Autoflight) are looking good and seems mostly identical. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |